Here are the top gaming graphics cards, from pricey models to high-end options.
Searching for the ideal GPU for your gaming computer? Here are the top Nvidia and AMD graphics card options that are currently on the market.
The market now offers graphics cards from NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel. So which graphics card is the best? Let’s evaluate and contrast their services.
Everything else comes in second to the best graphics cards as the heart of any gaming computer. Even the fastest CPU won’t accomplish much if there isn’t a strong GPU pushing pixels. We’ll offer solutions below for every budget and attitude, even though there isn’t one graphics card that will work for everyone. Whatever graphics card you’re looking for—the quickest, the best value, or the best card for the money—we’ve got you covered.
Table of Contents
By selecting the greatest graphics card, you may transform your gaming computer and enjoy high resolutions and frame rates. While GeForce RTX 4000 and Radeon RX 7000 GPUs will soon compete for supremacy, Intel’s Arc Alchemist lineup might sway gamers on a tight budget.
However, there are many alternative Nvidia, AMD, and Intel options available, so you don’t need a GPU kaiju to construct the greatest gaming Computer for your requirements. We’ve therefore put together a list of the top graphics card options available right now to help clear out the sea of specs.
Here are the best graphics cards in 2023:
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti – our top current-gen choice
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 – the best cheap and cheerful card
- AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX – the best AMD GPU
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 – a graphics card kaiju
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 – great value for money
| S.No. | Graphics Card | Value — Online (MSRP) | Performance | DXR Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | GeForce RTX 4090 | 13 — $1599 ($1600) | 1 — 158.1 | 1 — 146.6 |
| 2. | Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 12 — $1070 ($1000) | 2 — 148.3 | 3 — 86.3 |
| 3. | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 10 — $820 ($800) | 4 — 136.1 | 2 — 100.0 |
| 4. | Radeon RX 7900 XT | 11 — $880 ($900) | 3 — 140.9 | 4 — 76.5 |
| 5. | Radeon RX 6800 | 6 — $480 ($580) | 5 — 124.1 | 6 — 49.3 |
| 6. | Radeon RX 6700 XT | 2 — $339 ($480) | 6 — 105.9 | 9 — 38.8 |
| 7. | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 5 — $389 ($400) | 7 — 98.5 | 5 — 55.0 |
| 8. | Intel Arc A770 16GB | 7 — $349 ($350) | 9 — 85.3 | 7 — 41.0 |
| 9. | Radeon RX 6650 XT | 1 — $260 ($400) | 8 — 85.6 | 11 — 31.0 |
| 10. | GeForce RTX 3060 | 8 — $330 ($330) | 10 — 76.0 | 8 — 41.1 |
| 11. | Radeon RX 6600 | 3 — $230 ($330) | 11 — 71.3 | 12 — 25.1 |
| 12. | GeForce RTX 2060 | 4 — $230 ($300) | 12 — 59.1 | 10 — 31.2 |
| 13. | Intel Arc A380 | 9 — $140 ($140) | 13 — 31.1 | 13 — 11.4 |
1. GeForce RTX 4090
Faster Graphics Card, Ideal for Specialists and Makers
Some people believe that the quickest graphics card is the best, regardless of price. The GeForce RTX 4090 from Nvidia is designed specifically for this group of users. It also marks the introduction of Nvidia’s brand-new Ada Lovelace architecture, making it the company’s most powerful card—at least until the anticipated RTX 4090 Ti appears.
The RTX 4090 will have more to offer if you were dissatisfied that the RTX 3090 Ti was just marginally quicker (30%) than an RTX 3080 in most tasks. It performed on average 55% faster than the 3090 Ti throughout our regular set of gaming benchmarks. The lead increases to 78% when you launch a game with robust ray tracing effects! The 4090 is 25% quicker in games that use classic rasterization and performs just over twice as well in titles that use ray tracing, but it also costs roughly twice as much. AMD’s new RX 7900 XTX cannot compete with it.
Well to be clear about one thing: To get the most out of the RTX 4090, you actually need a high refresh rate 4K monitor. Its edge over a 3090 Ti at 1440p drops to 30%, while at 1080p, it is only 16%. When playing intensive ray tracing games at 1080p, it still outperforms AMD’s 6950 XT by more than double, despite being only 7% quicker at 1080p ultra and slightly slower at 1080p medium.
Also, it’s not only about game performance. The RTX 4090 is around 80% quicker than the RTX 3090 Ti in professional content creation workloads including Blender, Octane, and V-Ray. It is more than three times faster than the RX 7900 XTX when using Blender. And let’s not even begin to discuss duties requiring artificial intelligence. The RTX 4090 was eight times quicker than the RX 6950 XT in Stable Diffusion testing, despite the fact that it was difficult to even get things operating on AMD GPUs (we had to use Linux), and many other AI workloads presently only run on Nvidia GPUs.
If you’re solely considering rasterization games, AMD’s RDNA 3 solution to Ada Lovelace might be a better deal, but the RTX 4090 still holds the top spot in terms of sheer performance. To get the most out of the 4090, you might also wish to upgrade the CPU and power supply. At least RTX 4090 GPUs are frequently available now for close to the $1,600 launch MSRP.
| SPECIFICATIONS | REASONS TO BUY: | REASONS TO AVOID: |
| GPU: Ada AD102 GPU Cores: 16384 Boost Clock: 2,520 MHz Video RAM: 24GB GDDR6X 21 Gbps TBP: 450 watts | 1. Best 4K and possibly 8K gaming 2. Powerful ray tracing hardware 3. DLSS and now DLSS 3 4. 24GB is fantastic for content creation workloads | 1. Exorbitant cost and electricity demands 2. Cards retail for 25% more than the MSRP 3. Requires a powerful CPU and power supply |
2. Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Fastest GPU from AMD, excellent for
image preprocessing
With a price increase to match, AMD’s Radeon RX 7900 XTX has replaced the RX 6950 XT from the previous generation at the top of the list. It had an apparent price tag of $999, but it was almost instantly sold out, so we are now forced to wait for supply to catch up to demand. The majority of the time, that is the case; over the past month, cards priced at $999 have shown frequently, with the cheapest cards currently marked up less than $100. Yet, there is a valid explanation for the demand, as the 7900 XTX is equipped with AMD’s most recent RDNA 3 architecture.
This increases the 7900 XTX’s computing power significantly, and you also receive 33% extra RAM. In our rasterization test suite and ray tracing games, the new GPU performs on average 32% and 42% quicker than the 6950 XT, respectively. Furthermore, it achieves this increase in performance without noticeably increasing power consumption or graphics processor size. Saving $100 for the inferior RX 7900 XT instead of the top-tier RX 7900 lags behind by 15% as well, therefore it is not really wise to do so.
The performance of AMD’s GPUs in professional settings can be hit or miss. With AMD technology, some SPECviewperf applications perform admirably while others struggle. It goes without saying that Nvidia’s cards are a far superior choice if you want to conduct AI or deep learning research. However, AMD’s quickest choice for this generation is the RX 7900 XTX, which undoubtedly has plenty of power. It’s also worthwhile to think about the 7900 XT if you’re prepared to compromise because it’s now more reasonably priced.
| SPECIFICATIONS | REASONS TO BUY | REASONS TO AVOID |
| GPU: Navi 31 GPU Cores: 12288 Boost Clock: 2500 MHz Video RAM: 24GB GDDR6 20 Gbps TBP: 355 watts | 1. Great overall performance 2. Lots of VRAM and cache 3. Great for non-RT workloads 4. Good SPECviewperf results | 1. High starting MSRP 2. Much slower RT performance 3. Currently sold out or overpriced 4. Weak in AI / deep learning workloads |
3. Radeon RX 6650 XT
Best Deal for a Graphics Card Overall
At the moment, the Navi 23 architecture is used by AMD’s mainstream GPUs. Ordinarily, we’d anticipate a 32 CU Navi 22 model, code-named the RX 6700 non-XT, but AMD reduced the number of CUs, the width of the memory interface, and the size of the Infinity Cache to provide a smaller, more affordable chip with comparable performance. (Take note that the Radeon RX 6700 is now available and has 10GB of VRAM, although it is more expensive and only slightly improves performance.))
The RX 6650 XT is an upgrade and replacement for the current RX 6600 XT, providing marginally better performance for essentially the same cost. (Because the 6600 XT is being officially discontinued, prices have started to rise.) It is impressive that performance is marginally better than the RX 5700 XT from the previous generation, given that the memory bus has been reduced from 256 bits to just 128 bits.
| SPECIFICATIONS | REASONS TO BUY | REASONS TO AVOID |
| GPU: Navi 31 GPU Cores: 12288 Boost Clock: 2500 MHz Video RAM: 24GB GDDR6 20 Gbps TBP: 355 watts | +Power-efficient design +Good 1080p performance +Frequently quicker than RTX 3060 +Available for much less than MSRP | A 128-bit bus with just 8GB of VRAM and subpar ray tracing capability. |
Nonetheless, there is legitimate cause for concern over the 8GB of VRAM, and there are undoubtedly situations where the RTX 3060 proves to be the superior option, particularly when DLSS and DXR are taken into account. Even yet, when you consider the memory bandwidth, it’s amazing how much performance can be improved by a 32MB Infinity Cache. In essence, this is a chip that is 15% smaller than Navi 10 and is constructed on the same TSMC N7 node. It also produces greater framerates at 1080p.
Yet, there are times when it falters, with ray tracing being a significant one. Many of the games we tried that supported DXR (DirectX Raytracing) couldn’t even manage 20 frames per second at 1080p. Without DLSS, Nvidia’s RTX 3060 was roughly twice as fast, and with DLSS Quality mode, it was often an additional 40% quicker. As FSR gives AMD, Nvidia, and even Intel GPUs a similar performance boost, it doesn’t truly cure that either. The RX 6650 XT and RX 6600 XT felt disappointing after the other Big Navi processors delivered tremendous levels of VRAM.
Current internet pricing, which has significantly improved things, reflects that. Despite having a $399 MSRP, the RX 6650 XT is currently on sale for $260, which is only $25 more than the RX 6600, the previous bargain champion. The RX 6650 XT looks fantastic in comparison to the RTX 3050 which has a comparable online price. AMD won’t be updating its current midrange products until later in 2023.
4. Radeon RX 6600
Avoid Ray Tracing, maintain Excellent Mainstream Performance
The 6650 XT above has several advantages, but the Radeon RX 6600 cuts those advantages down a little. In non-RT games, it lags behind the RTX 3060 by roughly 15% overall, but in our tests, it was still 30% quicker than the RTX 3050. Although we observed it selling for little over $200 for the previous few months, prices have suddenly creeped back up to $250. Hopefully, this will change.
| SPECIFICATIONS | REASONS TO BUY | REASONS TO AVOID |
| GPU: Navi 23 GPU Cores: 1792 Boost Clock: 2,491 MHz Video RAM: 8GB GDDR6 14 Gbps TBP: 132 watts | Runs at maximum resolution and 60 frames per second + Power-efficient Usually costs around $200 | Can’t compete with the RTX 3060; not suitable for ray tracing; only has 8GB VRAM |
It’s still considerably cheaper than AMD’s stated $329 Pricing, which seemed excessive at launch – not that we actually saw those prices in appreciable amounts until recently. Yet with cards already coming for far less than MSRP, this is the second-best overall value, directly behind the RX 6650 XT. This is a fantastic alternative if you don’t want the latest extreme(ly costly) GPUs from AMD and Nvidia and simply want a good standard answer.
The RX 6600 competes against the RTX 3050 as well as GPUs from the RTX 20-series and GTX 16-series generations from before. Midrange graphics cards are a competitive market. In our tests, it ultimately delivers close to RTX 2070 performance, at least in non-ray tracing circumstances. But, when ray tracing is turned on, it performs horribly, averaging only 30 frames per second at 1080p medium in our DXR test suite and falling 20% behind Nvidia’s RTX 2060.
The RX 6600 is worth considering if ray tracing is not a concern for you. The card only consumes roughly 130W, which is significantly less power than comparable GPUs, and AMD’s Infinity Cache does wonders for what would otherwise appear to be a relatively powerful GPU. RDNA 3 GPUs probably won’t hit the sub-$250 price point until mid-2023 or later; Intel’s as-yet-unreleased Arc A580 is about the only serious potential rival on the horizon right now.
5. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DO YOU WANT THESE COMPARISONS?
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3050
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 2060
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3050 ti
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3090
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3060
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3080
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3060 ti
- rx 6700 xt vs rtx 3070
Differnce Between RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3050?
The RX 6700 XT and RTX 3050 are two graphics cards from different manufacturers, AMD and Nvidia, respectively. They are also aimed at different market segments, with the RX 6700 XT being a high-end graphics card and the RTX 3050 being a mid-range card.
In terms of performance, the RX 6700 XT is generally considered to be the more powerful card. It has more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB) and a higher memory bandwidth, which can help it perform better in games and other GPU-intensive applications. The RX 6700 XT is also generally more expensive than the RTX 3050.
On the other hand, the RTX 3050 is a more budget-friendly option, and it may be a better choice for those who don’t need the highest possible performance or who are building a more modest gaming PC. The RTX 3050 also includes Nvidia’s proprietary technologies like DLSS and ray tracing, which can enhance gaming experiences in supported titles.
Ultimately, the choice between these two graphics cards will depend on your specific needs, budget, and preferences. If you’re building a high-end gaming PC and want the best possible performance, the RX 6700 XT is likely the better choice. However, if you’re on a tighter budget or don’t need the highest performance, the RTX 3050 may be a good alternative.
Differnce Between RX 6700 XT vs RTX 2060?
The RX 6700 XT and RTX 2060 are two graphics cards from different manufacturers, AMD and Nvidia, respectively. They are both aimed at the mid-range market segment and offer similar performance and features.
In terms of raw performance, the RX 6700 XT is generally considered to be the more powerful card. It has more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB) and a higher memory bandwidth, which can help it perform better in games and other GPU-intensive applications. The RX 6700 XT is also generally more expensive than the RTX 2060.
On the other hand, the RTX 2060 is a more budget-friendly option, and it may be a better choice for those who don’t need the highest possible performance or who are building a more modest gaming PC. The RTX 2060 also includes Nvidia’s proprietary technologies like DLSS and ray tracing, which can enhance gaming experiences in supported titles.
Overall, if you’re looking for the best possible performance and are willing to spend more money, the RX 6700 XT is likely the better choice. However, if you’re on a tighter budget or don’t need the highest performance, the RTX 2060 may be a good alternative. Additionally, if you value ray tracing and DLSS, which are proprietary technologies of Nvidia, you may prefer the RTX 2060 over the RX 6700 XT.
Differnce Between RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3050 ti?
Street costs for AMD cards are roughly 50% lower than equivalent (based on headline average fps figures) Nvidia devices, even though the GPU market is still in a slump. Regardless of price, many seasoned users simply have no desire to purchase AMD graphics cards. According to Steam statistics, the combined market share of AMD’s RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs among PC gamers is barely 2.12%, compared to Nvidia’s RTX 2060’s 5.03%. The primitive marketing strategies used by AMD appear to have backfired. Millions of users bought inferior goods as a result of their blatant dominance of social media sites like YouTube and Reddit.